|
|
|
Please call Maryland House
Delegates TODAY
|
|
|
Congratulations on helping to stop the
redefinition of marriage in Maryland.
Your calls and emails made the difference!!!
But despite failing to redefine marriage,
special interests now
want to make you redefine
Gender through Maryland House
Bill 235 (HB235).
How extreme will the legislators go? The HB235 hearing
was last Wednesday. Maryland
Citizens for a Responsible Government (MCRG) has
testified about the lawsuits,
bathroom rapes (Montgomery
College & Asbury
Methodist Village) and Viewpoint
discrimination occurring
in Montgomery County after its Gender
Identity bill was passed. Now
we need your help again to pull Maryland
legislators away from the influences of
special interests and back to reality.
Click here for
a list of talking points. Let
them know that these Gender Identity bills
are bad news and ask them to vote against
the bill. With your help we were able
to stop this radical bill last year. And we
need to do it again.
Please also ask them to vote against HB285 which
gives individuals a new "right to sue Public
Accomodations" under the antidiscrimination
law for "any percieved discrimination" (such
as separating the bathrooms on the basis of
gender).
The full committee vote on HB235 could
be as
early as this Friday or it may be later.
Please forward this email and keep emailing
and calling until we notify you.
|
|
The bill is being heard in the Health and
Government Operations Committee.
Cick here to
locate and email your own legislators.
Click here for
a listing of all 23 committee members.
Click here for
a listing of the subcommittee members
discussing the bill today/thisThursday.
Call
individual legislators-Phone 301
970 5000. If you have limited time here
is a list of people to focus on.
Committee Chair Peter A Hammen (D, Dist. 46,
Southeast and South Baltimore) (410)
841-3772, (301)
858-3772) peter.hammen@house.state.md.us
Committee Ranking Member ROBERT COSTA (R,
Dist. 33B, Anne
Arundel Co) (410)
841-3551, (301)
858-3551 bob.costa@house.state.md.us
Subcommittee Chair Dan Morhaim (D, Dist. 11,
Baltimore County)
(410) 841-3054, (301)
858-3054 dan.morhaim@house.state.md.us
Subcommittee Ranking Member Nicholaus Kipke
(R, Dist.
31, Anne
Arundel Co) (410)
841-3421, (301)
858-3421 nicholaus.kipke@house.state.md.us
John P Donoghue D,
Dist. 2C, Washington
County
410) 841-3125, (301)
858-3125 john.donoghue@house.state.md.us
Shawn Z. Tarrant, D,
Dist. 40, Baltimore
City
(410) 841-3545, (301)
858-3545 shawn.tarrant@house.state.md.us
Delegate Veronica Turner (D, Dist. 26,
Prince George's County)
(410) 841-3212,(301)
858-3212 veronica.turner@house.state.md.us,
ERIC M. BROMWELL (D,
Dist. 8, Baltimore
County)
410) 841-3766, (301) 858-3766 eric.bromwell@house.state.md.us
Delegate Nathaniel Oaks (D, Dist. 41,
Baltimore City)
(410) 841-3283, (301)
858-3283nathaniel.oaks@house.state.md.us
|
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT HB235
Proponents are saying that they have
removed "public accommodations" from the
bill. You may remember this from
Montgomery County where we were assured
that the bill would not affect safety in
bathrooms, lockers and showers. We
have reviewed the bill and it still
contains accommodation and facility
language. But with or without such
language it will force Marylanders to
deny reality and is a bad bill.
Click here for
a list of exemptions that Governor
O'Malley supported when he was Mayor of Baltimore and
which were included in that city's Gender
Identity law. Assuming
that the legislators agree that it would
be wrong "to force Marylanders to deny
reality," an
infinite number of disclaimers would
have to be placed in the proposed state
Gender Identity Bill in order to secure
the rights of individuals to simply be
honest in their everyday lives.
These disclaimers would be absolutely
necessary in order to protect Maryland
constituents from viewpoint
discrimination imposed by their
own Government and would
have to include items such as "it is not
discriminatory for individuals to:
-
Use
pronouns reflecting birth sex."
-
Suggest that life would be better
for such individuals if they didn't
transition and break up their own
family."
-
State
that taking hormones unnecessarily
is dangerous and surgery can have
complications."
-
Etc.
etc."
The bill is flawed and uncorrectable
because in America no one should be
allowed to force "their definition of
reality" on others. And at present,
because of the power of special
interests, we doubt that any disclaimers
(protections for you) will be allowed in
the bill.
In fact, in Montgomery County where a
similar gender identity bill was passed
over the wishes of the overwhelming
majority of residents, we are currently
disputing a recent ruling by the Montgomery
County Ethics Commission
which held that Marylanders are not
credible witnesses if they fail to use
what the Commission considers to be the
correct pronouns in addressing a man as
a woman. We believe that this
governmental ruling is an example of
viewpoint discrimination that will be
imposed on all Marylanders by these
defective Gender Identity laws.
To impose their viewpoint on the rest of
us, the Ethics Commission had
to totally ignore the ethics law.
Section 19A-14(e) of the Montgomery
County Ethics Code states that: A
public employee must not intimidate,
threaten, coerce or discriminate against any
person for the purpose of interfering
with that person's freedom to engage in
political activity. Yet
Dana Beyer, a transgendered woman who
helped draft Montgomery County's gender
identity law as an assistant to Councilmember Duchy
Trachtenberg, bullied and threatened
residents who were collecting signatures
for a petition referendum to place the
county's gender identity law on the
ballot for a vote by the people.
Click here to
watch the following seconds-long video,
where Beyer
falsely tells petition collectors and
would-be signers that they will be asked
to leave a Giant food store, saying that
"An email went out; you're going to be
asked to leave. Any petitions gathered
today are illegal."
Click here to
read our press release about the
incident:
Further, a Sentinel article reported
that, "Dr. Dana Beyer, a Senior Policy
Analyst to Councilmember Duchy
Trachtenberg, .. said that she
and a few other supporters went to
grocery stores where CRG members were
collecting signatures .... 'In
all but one place we talked
to the management of these grocery
stores and the management had them
removed' "
Beyer said."
This and other incriminating evidence of
outright harassment and disruption of
referendum activity were totally ignored
by the Commission. This travesty of
justice only continues the viewpoint
discrimination emanating from Montgomery
County.
In Montgomery County, Duchy Trachtenberg
the chief sponsor of the Gender Identity
bill was the only councilmember not
re-elected. Ask legislators to not
vote for HB235.
MARYLAND CITIZENS
FOR A RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT
|
|
|